A New York Times headline reports the good news for Trump but the good is not enough for the New York Times. The good news must be balanced with bad news, even if it’s just a nudging toward amorphous doubt. You know that Trump. There’s always more disruption and chaos coming.
What will the NYT say if Trump’s tariffs have this effect across the board and all countries drop their tariffs? Will the NYT credit Trump for his success — for his audacious, clever move?
I see that yesterday, the NYT had this headline: “Musk Says He Hopes Europe and U.S. Move to a ‘Zero-Tariff Situation’/The billionaire adviser to the Trump administration appeared to part ways with the president in a videoconference appearance with Italy’s far-right League party.” I give the Times credit for slipping in that weasel word, “appeared.” The 2 men appeared to part ways. And it appears different today. Now that Vietnam has responded to the incentive — oh, look at that! — the 2 men seem to be going the same way.
Well, they looked like that yesterday too, but the NYT needed to continue on its way, making trouble for Trump. There’s always bad news inside any good news.
I need a phrase that’s the reverse of “Every cloud has a silver lining.” Maybe: “Every pong-pong fruit has its deadly poison seeds.” I mean, to hell with the agitation in New York Times headlines! Tonight is the finale of Season 3 of “The White Lotus.” Those seeds are getting into one of those protein smoothies Patrick Schwarzenegger keeps whipping up, right?