The Insightful Immigration Blog

Commentaries on Immigration Policy, Cases, and Trends

By Cyrus D. Mehta and Kaitlyn Box
The Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. Barbara did far more than invalidate an overreaching executive order – it prevented a wholesale destabilization of American citizenship that could have echoed backward through generations. By a narrow but decisive majority, the Court rejected President Trump’s attempt to narrow birthright

By Cyrus D. Mehta and Manjeeta Chowdhary *
For many beneficiaries, approval of an O-1 petition by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) feels like the final hurdle has been cleared. After all, USCIS has already reviewed the petition and determined that the beneficiary qualifies for O-1 classification as an individual possessing extraordinary ability or

By Prof. Stacy Caplow, Brooklyn Law School[1]
Do you want to be a judge?  Hurry up to apply—the deadline is July 17, 2026.  Look no further than this ad which says:
“Help write the next chapter of America. Apply today to become a deportation judge. Define America for Generations.”[2]
The Trump administration is

By Cyrus D. Mehta and Damira Zhanatova∗
In Dorcas International Institute of Rhode Island v. USCIS, No. 26‑cv‑132‑JJM‑PAS, Chief Judge John J. McConnell Jr. held that USCIS’s Trump‑era “Travel Ban Countries” policies violated both the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). He found that the agency had thrown

By Cyrus D. Mehta and Manjeeta Chowdhary *
In visa categories such as EB-1 and O-1, evidence is the cornerstone of the petition. The USCIS Policy Manual identifies the types of evidence that may support O-1 and EB-1 petitions, underscoring that these classifications are fundamentally evidence-driven. In EB-1 cases, the central issue is whether the