In its recent decision in Matter of K-E-S-G-, 29 I&N Dec. 245 (BIA 2025), the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) held that “a particular social group defined by the alien’s sex or sex and nationality, standing alone, is overbroad and insufficiently particular to be cognizable under the INA” as a basis for asylum. Matter
Latest Post
More Posts
Harrow v. Department of Defense and What it Means for Immigration Cases: the 30-Day Time Limit for Filing a Petition for Review Is Still Very Important, But Probably Not Jurisdictional Anymore
Lock Up Falsely Arrested Adjustment Applicants and Teenage Shoplifters, or Be Sued: the House’s “Laken Riley Act”
Canada Begins New Program for Holders of U.S. H-1B Visas – And They Really Do Mean H-1B Visas, Not H-1B Status, Although Family Members Need Not Have Any Kind of H-4
Canada Announces New Program for Holders of U.S. H-1B Visas – But Do They Mean Visas, or H-1B Nonimmigrant Status?
Some Highlights of the EB-5 Reauthorization: CSPA Protection and How 245(k) and Concurrent Filing Combine to Create a New Option for Some Applicants Who Have Recently Dropped Out of Status
“The Process By Which Removability Will Be Determined”: How the Recent District Court Decision Ordering the Reinstatement of MPP Contradicts Itself
The Law Does Not Compel the Impossible– Or Does It?: Matter of C-C- and Awuku-Asare v. Garland
Elephants, Mouseholes, and Sickness: My Comment on the Latest Anti-Asylum Proposed Rule. Do You Have One Too?
Implementation of Safe Third Country Agreement Held to Violate Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms—So Why Will Prior U.S. Asylum Claimants Be Denied a Hearing at the Refugee Protection Division in Canada Even After This Takes Effect?
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Firm/Org