Latest from Harold Gie News

Adventure tourism often promises unforgettable experiences, breathtaking landscapes, close encounters with wildlife, and the thrill of exploring unfamiliar terrain. But when something goes wrong, an important legal question arises: can a tour operator rely on a disclaimer hidden in brochures or forms to escape liability for serious injuries? The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) recently

Protracted divorce proceedings frequently leave spouses vulnerable and uncertain, especially where disputes arise over the family home. A common question is whether a spouse may rely on their continued occupation therein until the finalisation of the divorce proceedings, even where the property belongs to the other spouse. Divorce proceedings may be aggravated by difficulties relating to the division of property, especially where spouses are married out of community

In a significant judgment delivered by the Western Cape Division of the High Court on 26 November 2025, the Court in Construction Company (Pty) Ltd v City of Cape Town and Others (2950/2024 ; 22591/2023) [2025] ZAWCHC 552, confirmed that an organ of state may decline to award a tender, where contracting with the bidder would expose the institution

Can the previous registered owner of immovable property successfully rely on the Roman principle of fraus omnia vitiat, or “fraud unravels all”, which would entitle them to restitution of their property? This was the central legal question in a recent matter heard by the high court.  
The matter concerned an attorney who was struck from the roll of legal practitioners and the

The law is clear on how a will must be signed and witnessed. One of the requirements for a valid will is that the testator must sign each page of the will with what is commonly known as a “wet ink” signature. Ignoring this guideline may lead to a day in court.  
Electronic signature 
In Mmelesi v Mokgoro the high court heard an application for leave to appeal in respect of an earlier judgment handed down

Contracts lie at the heart of everyday business dealings. They create expectations, define responsibilities, and set the tone for the business relationship. But what happens when one party claims that they don’t have to perform because you didn’t perform first? In South African law, this defence is referred to as the exceptio non adimpleti contractus.

In the recent case of Lenette Janse De Wit & 2 Others v Toerien De Wit NO & 6 Others 2026 ZASCA 23, the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) provided important guidance on the interpretation of section 13 of the Trust Property Control Act 57 of 1988 (TPCA), which deals with, inter alia, the termination

A new Constitutional Court judgment about the validity of customary and civil marriages has huge implications. An untold number of Black couples, married under customary law and later under civil law, are suddenly finding that, in the wake of this judgment, their rights are not protected in the way they had assumed. Now they must