Most recently, the SCA considered an appeal concerning a payment made to Pick ‘n Pay by attorneys on behalf of their franchisee, pursuant a sale of business agreement. In the case of Pick ‘n Pay Retailers (Pty) Ltd v Ramalho, NO and Another (946/2023) [2025] ZASCA 97, a dispute arose because the payment was made
Latest Post
More Posts
TO DRAFT OR NOT TO DRAFT: NON-COMPLIANCE AND CONDONATION UNDER THE WILLS ACT 7 OF 1953
ESTATE PLANNING ACROSS JURISDICTIONS
NO WILL. NO CLARITY. PLENTY HEARTACHE
HIGH COURT RULES THAT CRYPTOCURRENCY IS NOT MONEY AND NOT SUBJECT TO ANY EXCHANGE CONTROL REGULATIONS
WHERE DOES THE BUCK STOP IN CASES OF GROSS ABUSE OF A CLOSE CORPORATION’S JURISTIC PERSONALITY?
TENDER TIMES: VALIDITY PERIODS, DISQUALIFICATIONS & RESTRICTIONS FROM BIDDING
CURATORSHIP: A CAUSE OF OR CURE TO CONFLICT?
TO DIG OR NOT TO DIG: WHEN PATERNITY REQUIRES PROOF FROM THE GRAVE
THE DUEL OVER DUAL CITIZENSHIP: THE LANDMARK 2025 CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS