The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a jury’s noninfringement verdict, finding that the district court correctly interpreted the article “a” and antecedent “said” in the asserted claims to require that a single microprocessor be capable of performing every one of the recited microprocessor functions. Salazar v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al., […]
The post It’s All in the Grammar: “A” Still Means “One or More,” but Single Component Must Perform All Claimed Functions appeared first on IP UPDATE.