The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed in part, reversed in part, and vacated in part a district court’s post-trial rulings in a trade secret and contract dispute, finding that a trade secret plaintiff may pursue unjust enrichment damages under both the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) and the Michigan Uniform Trade
Latest Post
More Posts
Words of approximation require more precision after narrowing amendments
USPTO Director IPR institution discretion survives APA challenge
USPTO elevates precedential and informative decisions on discretionary institution in IPR/PGR
USPTO launches SEP Working Group aimed at strengthening patent enforcement
USPTO introduces voluntary search disclosure declarations in Board proceedings
Spooky silence: USPTO Director summarily denies 13 IPR petitions
Failure to reassess subject matter eligibility after similar claims invalidated justifies attorneys’ fees
USPTO Director to decide AIA petitions
On repeat: Separate accrual rule doesn’t apply to continuing harm from infringing act
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Firm/Org