Skip to content

menu

Open Legal Blog Archive logo
HomeAboutBlogsFAQsSubmit

Solar Cells and Modules Section 201 Investigation

By Joshua Morey on May 23, 2017

On May 23, 2017, pursuant to a petition filed on behalf of Suniva, Inc., (“Suniva”) the U.S. International Trade Commission (the “Commission”) initiation a Section 201 safeguard investigation on crystalline silicon photovoltaic (CSPV) cells and modules.  Unlike antidumping and countervailing duty investigations, Section 201 investigations provide domestic industries relief from fairly-traded imports that are being “imported into the United States in such increased quantities as to be a substantial cause of serious injury, or the threat thereof,” to the domestic industry producing an article that is “like or directly competitive with the imported article.”

A second U.S. producer, SolarWorld Americas Inc., (“SolarWorld”) and the Petitioner in several antidumping and countervailing duty investigations of solar cells and modules from China and Taiwan, recently expressed support for the petition by joining Suniva as a co-petitioner.

The ITC is scheduled to make its determination of serious injury (or threat of serious injury) by September 22, 2017, and submit its final report to the President by November 13, 2017.  If the Commission finds the domestic industry is seriously injured (or threatened with serious injury), the President is required to take action to “facilitate efforts by the domestic industry to make a positive adjustment to import competition and provide greater economic and social benefits than costs.”  The President is authorized to implement several different forms of relief including an increase in or imposition of duties or a tariff-rate quota.

  • Posted in:
    Corporate & Commercial, International
  • Blog:
    Trade and Manufacturing Monitor
  • Organization:
    Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. logo
Seattle, Washington
Copyright © 2026, Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo