Global Arbitration News

Latest from Global Arbitration News

Bronzelink Holdings Ltd. v. STM Atlantic N.V., No. 2:25‑cv‑06783‑JLS‑PVC (C.D. Cal. Feb. 9, 2026).[1]

Factual Background

Respondents Emil Youssefzadeh, Umar Javed, and STM Atlantic N.V. (collectively, “Respondents”) were individuals and their closely held corporate entities who sought to build and launch a communications satellite to provide internet access to underserved parts of Africa. To

In January, we reported on the decision of the Higher Regional Court Cologne dated 17 February 2025 (Case No. 19 Sch 24/24) regarding the requirement for security deposit for costs in Germany. Now, the German Federal Court of Justice has published a decision regarding the same topic dated 15 January 2026 (Case No. I ZB

Parties sometimes prefer litigation to arbitration because court proceedings offer summary judgment, which can dispose of unmeritorious claims or defences at an early stage. In response, arbitral institutions such as SIAC, HKIAC and (most recently), the ICC have introduced procedures for early or summary determination. Broadly speaking, these procedures allow a party to seek the

The new ICC Arbitration Rules 2026 (“2026 Rules”) will enter into force on 1 June 2026. Five years after the last revision of the ICC Arbitration Rules 2021 (“2021 Rules”), the ICC has introduced a targeted set of amendments designed to enhance efficiency and usability. Rather than overhauling the framework of ICC arbitration, the 2026

In 2025, Luxembourg saw major arbitration developments. The Luxembourg Arbitration Center (“LAC“) updated its rules effective 1 October 2025. Courts addressed issues including applicable law for arbitration agreements, asset freezes during annulment proceedings, and whether foreign arbitral awards after company liquidation count as administrative debts (dettes de la masse). These actions show Luxembourg courts’ ongoing

In Singapore, international arbitration is governed by the International Arbitration Act (IAA), the Arbitration Act (AA) and the Arbitration (International Investment Disputes) Act. The legislative framework, which is substantially based on the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration (“Model Law”), and the Courts’ pro-arbitration approach to the application of the legislative framework ensure that

Dahdah v. Rocket Mortg., LLC, No. 24-1910 (6th Cir. Jan. 26, 2026)[1] Factual Background

Michael Dahdah (“Dahdah”) wanted to refinance his mortgage. On three occasions between October 2020 and February 2021, Dahdah visited the website LowerMyBills.com, which provides free financial advice and a referral service for consumers. LowerMyBills.com shares the same parent company as

Introduction

While the arbitrability of patent validity disputes has long been established in many jurisdictions, the issue remains a subject of controversy in others, particularly in Germany. This debate arises from the fact that patents are intellectual property rights granted by a sovereign state, the validity of which is traditionally determined by state courts. Recently,

Ambrosia v. Blazesoft Ltd., No. 25 C 1723 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 21, 2025)[1]

Factual Background

Vincent Ambrosia, Jr. and Robert Houpt were customers of online gaming websites who brought a class action lawsuit against the operators of those websites. Plaintiffs alleged that Defendants preyed on them through addictive and illegal online gambling falsely marketed