The Nassau County Supreme Court addressed whether AI prompts and outputs may be protected in litigation when it quashed non-party subpoenas seeking those materials.
eDiscovery Watch
Blog Authors
Latest from eDiscovery Watch
Mastering the Chat Matrix: Technical E-Discovery Considerations for Collaborative Communications Platforms
This eDiscovery blog post below identifies general considerations that legal teams and vendors may find useful when thinking about data assessment and the preservation of chat threads in connection with a litigation hold.…
Seventh Circuit Addresses Counsel’s Obligations When AI‑Generated Hallucinations Appear in an Adversary’s Brief
On March 30, 2026, the Seventh Circuit addressed sanctions for an attorney citing AI-generated hallucinations and clarified the responsibilities of opposing counsel when receiving such a pleading.…
Should Protective Orders Expressly Restrict Using AI with Confidential Information? Lessons from Morgan v. V2X (Part II)
Morgan v. V2X explored court‑crafted limits on using AI with confidential discovery and what AI‑specific protective orders may mean for litigants.…
Work Product Protection and the Disclosure of AI Tools in Discovery: Lessons from Morgan v. V2X (Part I)
In Morgan v. V2X, Inc., a Colorado district court examined how AI use in litigation affects work product protection and the handling of confidential information.…
Disclosure in England and Wales: Where to Next on the AI Journey?
As generative AI enters disclosure practice in England and Wales, courts and practitioners face emerging questions about transparency, proportionality, and human oversight.…
AI in the Courtroom: Key Takeaways From Recent Decisions in the Courts of England and Wales
Courts in England and Wales are confronting the risks of AI-assisted document preparation, with recent decisions highlighting the potential risk of fabricated case citations in common law jurisdictions where precedent is paramount.…
Court Sanctions Highlight Potential Risks of Using Unchecked AI in Litigation
In February, a federal judge in the Southern District of New York issued case-ending sanctions against an attorney who failed to “learn from his mistakes” and repeatedly submitted filings containing false, AI-generated citations to the court.…
April 14 WEBINAR | eDiscovery and Artificial Intelligence: 2025 Year in Review and 2026 Trends
Greenberg Traurig Shareholders Jacqueline Tambone deGrandpre and Elizabeth E. Georgiopoulos, along with Law Clerk/JD Luis Carlos Balaguer Escobar will present the Boston Bar Association webinar, “eDiscovery and Artificial Intelligence: 2025 Year in Review and 2026 Trends.” DeGrandpre will moderate the program, with Georgiopoulos and Balaguer Escobar serving as panelists.
This timely program will explore…
Discovery and Potential Privilege of Generative AI Prompts
During the Generative AI and Litigation CLE Panel at the New York State Bar Association’s Annual Meeting, the panelists discussed whether AI “prompts” that are typically used to create output from generative AI are discoverable and whether all such prompts can be deemed privileged. The audience seemed surprised to learn that the short answers are…