The U.S. Supreme Court will review a ruling that an Andy Warhol print infringed a copyrighted photograph taken by photographer, Lynn Goldsmith, of the late musician, Prince.
We certainly hope–as much as one can hope for anything these days–that SCOTUS cleans up the wasteland that has become of
I had a lovely conversation with fellow lawyer and artist, Stephanie Drawdy, on the NFT craze, pets, art law, and the origins of The Art & Law Program. You can listen to the Podcast here. Hope you
The Philadelphia Museum of Art, the Centre Pompidou, and the Association Marcel Duchamp have digitized their vast archives of material on the Dadaist and placed it online, where it is free to all. Enjoy!
If you have kids at home and want them to do something fun and educational, try the Art & Law Coloring Book, an ongoing project by The Art & Law Program. Really a great collection of drawings by great artists, including:
Emma Jane Bloomfield Damien Davis Molly Dilworth João Enxuto Soda Jerk Clare
If you’re confused as to what the hell NFTs are, particularly art NFTs, here’s a new article by Alfred Steiner that pretty much walks you through and safely out of the NFT hell.
In his article, Steiner explains what NFTs are and what it means to own one. He also discusses why that meaning
Warhol’s estate says there is a “cloud of legal uncertainty over an entire genre of visual art.”
A little drastic perhaps but if there’s a fair use case the U.S. Supreme Court would grant a hearing, it’s probably this one.
Right here.
Some of my art teachers told me to hate this guy. Instead, I ended up loving him. He was brilliant.
Brought to you by Azmina Jasani and Emelyne Peticca, who believe that if “the Warhol [v. Goldsmith] case is any indication, [Richard] Prince has an uphill battle to prove that he made fair use of [Donald] Graham’s image.”
Jasani and Peticca point out one other aspect of note re: the Second
