As July gets underway, here’s what we’re reading.
Robert H. Thomas
Latest from Robert H. Thomas - Page 2
SCOTUS Will Answer Whether Williamson County Final Decision Ripeness Governs Free Exercise Claims
Here’s the latest in a case we’ve been following, which asks whether Williamson County’s final decision ripeness requirement is limited to takings claims.…
We’re Going To Find Out Whether Attorneys Fees Are Part Of Just Compensation In Natural Gas Act Takings
This just in: the U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to review a case from North Dakota (brought by our colleagues Derrick Braaten and the good folks at the Institute for Justice), asking whether attorneys fees are included in just compensation when a private pipeline takes property by eminent domain by using the federal power of…
Courthouse Steps: Pung v. Isabella County
Newly released: the Federalist Society’s “Courthouse Steps” series covers Pung v. Isabella County, where the U.S. Supreme Court held that “just compensation” for Tyler takings is usually measured by the surplus after a tax sale and not fair market value of the property, unless the tax sale process is unfair or skewed. Here’s…
Unhappy 47th Anniversary, Penn Central
Sad birthday wishes to what just might be our most un-favorite decision ever, Penn Central Transp. Co. v. New York City, 438 U.S. 104 (1978), which turns 47 today. This in addition to the unhappy Kelo-versary earlier this week. A takings and regulatory takings one-two punch! Time has not treated the opinion well.…
Pung Round-Up
Here is what we’re reading today, comments and thoughts on yesterday’s U.S. Supreme Court decision in Pung v. Isabella County.…
Pung Decided – “Just” Compensation May Not Always Mean Fair Market Value: “The Fifth Amendment protects the … right to surplus proceeds from the tax sale, not compensation for the property’s fair market value.”
This just in: the Supreme Court has decided Pung v. Isabella County, No. 25-95 (June 23, 2026). And the result — that “just compensation” for Tyler takings is usually measured by the surplus over the tax sale and not fair market value of the property, unless the tax sale process is unfair or skewed —…
Kelo Hits 21 (And Gets Worse With Age)
It hardly seems like two decades-plus have passed. After all, it was a mere 10 years ago we were lamenting “Kelo At 10: Still Stinks, And A Decade Has Not Lessened The Odor.” But yes, it was 21 years ago today … the U.S. Supreme Court, by the thinnest of margins, held in Kelo v.…
Texas: Agreeing To Settle A Just Compensation Claim Can Trigger Repurchase Right If Govt Doesn’t Use Property For Stated Purpose
The majority opinion of the Texas Supreme Court in State of Texas v. JRJ Pusok Holdings, LLC, No. 24-0447 (June 12, 2026), starts off pretty good: “The right to own property is ‘fundamental, natural, inherent, inalienable, not derived from the legislature and . . . preexist[s] even constitutions.'” And it gets better from there. At…
CA7: Illinois Recognizes Due Process Property In Kin’s Remains
In Betts v Boone County, No. 25-1685 (June 15, 2026), the big question facing the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit was whether qualified immunity kept next-of-kin from prevailing on a section 1983 due process claim after the county coroner kept the skull of a murder victim as a “trophy” for forty years…