It is, thus, clear that the owner was aware of the nature of licence possessed by the driver engaged by him and also he was aware of the fact that on the driving licence of the driver, there was no such endorsement of carrying dangerous and hazardous goods.12. Learned Tribunal seems to have acted
Law Web
Latest from Law Web - Page 3
Best Websites for Converting Marathi Judgments into English
Converting a Marathi court judgment into English is now easier because several websites allow the user to upload the full PDF and receive an English version in return. This is particularly useful where judgments are downloaded from the eCourts portal in text-based PDF form and a quick working translation is needed for reading, review, or…
Important Questions and answers on law (Part 7 )
1) Questions and answers on law (Part 82)
…
Important Questions and answers on law (Part 6 )
1) Questions and answers on law (Part 72 )
Bombay HC: Acceptance Of Insurance Claim Under Protest Not ‘Accord And Satisfaction
However, in the present case, there is no admitted claim, and the controversy concerns the application of the principle of accord and satisfaction in light of the claimant’s letter dated 16th October 2018 and the discharge voucher signed under protest. I have already recorded reasons that the said letter and the discharge voucher cannot be …
Karnataka HC: Claimant Can’t Seek Compensation From Offending Vehicle’s Insurer If Already Received From Own Insurance Company
It is relevant to note that the claimant claimed a sum of Rs.1,41,516/- towards property damage from the Insurance Company of the offending vehicle. The claimant was examined as PW1. In the cross examination, he states that he has received the entire amount towards the damage of the property from his Insurance company. Admittedly, damaged …
Kerala HC Summarises law on liability of parents and Guardian of minor in case of rash driving by minor
…
Madras HC: Under which circumstances the court can direct forwarding of complaint to police under S 151 of CPC?
In the case on hand, since, as I have already pointed out, the offence of forgery of Exs. A2 and A3 was committed outside the Court, even before they were produced before the Court, there can be no impediment for the police to register a case. When it was pointed out by this Court to…
Supreme Court: Whether the court should consider gravity of offence alongwith triple test before releasing any accused on regular bail?
Thus from cumulative perusal of the judgments cited on either side including the one rendered by the Constitution Bench of this Court, it could be deduced that the basic jurisprudence relating to bail remains the same inasmuch as the grant of bail is the Rule and refusal is the exception so as to ensure that…
Fraud at the Courthouse Door: When Can Civil Courts Use Section 151 CPC to Set the Criminal Law in Motion?
Why this question mattersCivil judges increasingly encounter forged documents, fabricated seals, and engineered “fraud on the court” designed to siphon public money or manipulate rights. The immediate civil response is clear: refuse or recall relief obtained by fraud. But a connected and difficult question is: can the civil court itself trigger criminal prosecution,…
