Courts are exercising their power under Rule[1] 30(b)(4) to order that depositions be taken remotely and by videoconference during these uncertain times of the coronavirus pandemic. Such orders reflect concerns about the progress of cases, as discussed in our prior blog, and the public health. With remote depositions being essential under current circumstances, attorneys need to learn how to effectively and efficiently manage such depositions. We discuss here four aspects of remote depositions that require special attention, and provide tips to help minimize technical difficulties, ensure confidentiality, and provide the examining attorney with reasonable control over the proceeding, all while following the applicable federal and local rules and court orders.
More Posts
No Excuses: Remote Depositions Required in the Age of COVID-19
Patent Litigation Filings on the Increase with the COVID-19 Pandemic
The Cold Hard Fact of Arctic Cat: Actual Notice is Necessary to Protect a Damages Claim from the Cold After Unmarked Patented Goods are Sold
Federal Circuit Says Logos Must Be Taken Seriously in Evaluating Infringement of Design Patents
Moving Cases Toward Completion During the Coronavirus Pandemic: Has the Time Finally Come for Increased Reliance on Remote Hearings and Depositions?
Federal Circuit Holds PTAB Cannot Cancel Claims as Indefinite in IPR; Where Claims Cannot be Construed, PTAB’s Authority Limited to Denying Institution or Saying So in Final Written Decision
USITC Finalizes Amendments To Procedural Rules Governing Section 337 Investigations
Exergen Corp. v. Kaz USA Represents Another In A String Of Recent Setbacks For Patent Infringement Defendants On Eligibility Challenges
Does Aatrix Software Provide Software Patent Owners Shelter From The “Alice Storm”?
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS