The Southern District of New York recently dismissed a putative class action challenging the marketing of Grüns Nutrition’s “Superfood Greens Gummies.” In a detailed opinion, Judge Liman found that the company’s core messaging around “comprehensive nutrition” was either obvious puffery or too ambiguous—once read in context—to mislead a reasonable consumer. Cavallaro-Kearins v. Grüns Nutrition Inc.,
Latest Post
More Posts
That’s a “Wrap”: Second Circuit Upholds Click-Wrap Mandatory Arbitration Provision
Two Copyright Claim Wrongs Don’t Make a Copyright Claim Right: Analyzing Melendez v. Sirius XM Radio, Inc.
A Slammed (Open)Door: FTC Reaches $62 Million Proposed Settlement with Real Estate Company
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS