On May 28, 2025, in Soroban Capital Partners LP v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo 2025-52) (“Soroban II”), the Tax Court held the active role of limited partners in a fund manager caused them to fail to qualify as “limited partners” for purposes of section 1402(a)(13) and, therefore, the limited partners were subject to self-employment tax.[1]
Latest Post
More Posts
One Big Beautiful Bill: Update on Provisions for Sports Industry
The One Big Beautiful Bill: Relevant Provisions for Sports Industry
The One Big Beautiful Bill: SALT Deduction Workarounds Under Fire
Final Regulations Issued on Allocation of Partnership Liabilities Under Section 752
Trump Administration Disavows the OECD Global Tax Deal
Tax Court Holds That Active Limited Partners of State Law Limited Partnerships May Be Subject to Self-Employment Tax
Proposed Regulations Provide Guidance to Exempt Organizations on Identifying Separate Unrelated Trade or Businesses
Tax Court Rules that Extensions of Variable Prepaid Forward Contracts Do Not Result in Taxable Exchanges
Final and Temporary Debt-Equity Regulations Issued by the IRS
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS