In a recent judgement, the Delhi High Court, while hearing an appeal against an order of the Controller of Patents and Designs, which refused a patent grant, distinguished between a technical method and a business method while examining the technical contributions/ effects of an invention. In the impugned order, the Controller refused a patent application titled “Methods and Devices for Authentication of an Electronic Payment Card using Electronic Token” on the grounds that the claimed invention falls under Section 3(k) of the Patents Act (“Act”), categorising it as a business method and a computer programme, per se.
More Posts
Is it acceptable to file divisional application on the day of grant of parent application?
Procedural Fairness and Service Errors: Lessons from the Coaster Shoes Trademark Dispute
Portable Vehicle Management System Denied Patent
Fairness, Equity and Balance of Convenience for Grant of Injunction
Section 3(h): Method of Agriculture and Jurisprudence
Synergism to be displayed across the breadth of patent claim
Court settles patentability of man-made and novel non-living substance
Delhi HC dismisses instant messaging patent appeal
Navigating Change: Unravelling the Biological Diversity (Amendment) Act, 2023
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
Firm/Org