The Delhi High Court decided an important case on patent law in Novo Nordisk A/S v. Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd. The dispute involved Semaglutide, a widely used drug for diabetes and obesity. It addressed an important issue: can a patentee/ Plaintiff obtain an injunction if the Defendant, with knowledge of the Plaintiff’s patent rights, proceeds with production/ manufacturing of the patented drug,without first initiating revocation or non-infringement proceedings. Notably, the Delhi High Court declined to release the Defendant from its undertaking of not selling the patented drug in India as it had begun manufacturing/ production without “clearing the way”, despite being fully aware of the suit patent. The Court, however, allowed the Defendant to export to jurisdictions where the Plaintiff holds no patent rights. The judgment serves as an important precedent in determining the inter-relationship between injunctive relief and patent validity challenges.
Latest Post
More Posts
India’s Intellectual Property Ecosystem: A Record-Breaking Year Insights From The Annual Report 2024–25 Published By The Patent Office
(Non) Application of Mind? Controller’s role in Pre-Grant Opposition Proceedings
Delhi High Court’s Ruling in F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ag & Anr. V. Natco Pharma
Decoding Patent Infringement: Essential Elements, Equivalents, and Estoppel in Crystal Crop Protection v. Safex Chemicals
Whether “CROMPTON PEBBLE” and “PEBBLE” are similar or identical?
Reject patent application on merit, not for failing to follow procedure: Delhi High Court
Draft Guidelines for Examination of Computer Related Inventions 2025
A Legal Analysis of Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v. Maj. (Retd.) Sukesh Behl & Anr.: Patent Enforcement and Infringement Liability
Proceedings seeking revocation of a Patent not same as those seeking a finding of Invalidity
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
Firm/Org