It is back to state court for Acer America Corp., after the Federal Circuit held that Acer’s state law trade secret claims should never have been removed to federal court in the first instance. Intellisoft Ltd. v. Acer America Corp., No. 19-1522. Vacating the district court’s judgment in Acer’s favor, the Federal Circuit reiterated longstanding precedent that only a “special and small category” of cases involving state law claims, such as those requiring resolution of a substantial patent question, give rise to federal subject matter jurisdiction. Cases in which a party merely uses patents as evidence of trade secret misappropriation are not among them.
More Posts
False Advertising Claims Lurk in the Age of COVID-19
The Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) Can Apply To Acts of Misappropriation Occurring Entirely Outside the United States
The Federal Circuit Takes a Mulligan and Reins in the Eastern District of Texas’s Assertion of Venue the Second Time Around
A Private Sale is Still a Sale – SCOTUS Affirms the Federal Circuit for a Change
A New Slant: Supreme Court Invalidates Bar to Registering “Disparaging” Trademarks
Exhausted: The Supreme Court Takes The Federal Circuit To Task (Again)
Change of Scenery: TC Heartland Reshapes the Patent Litigation Landscape
Supreme Court Tosses Laches Defense To Patent Damages
The Northern District of California’s Recent Patent Local Rules Amendments: Elevating Damages Considerations to the Same Level as Infringement and Invalidity Contentions
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Firm/Org