A recent decision from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina serves as a useful reminder for insurers in coverage litigation that a disputed coverage determination, standing alone, does not give rise to a viable claim for bad faith or unfair claim settlement practices. In Navia v. State Farm Fire
Latest Post
More Posts
Jackson v. Spinnaker: Court Rules a Thorough Investigation is Just Good Business, Not Bad Faith
The Fine Line Between Delay and Bad Faith: Insights from the Fifth Circuit.
Louisiana Court Finds That an Insured Breached its Duty to Cooperate
What Is Reasonable Care for Maintaining Heat in an Unoccupied Home?
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS