A recent decision out of the District of Massachusetts serves as a reminder that a court may consider even a single communication by an advertiser made directly to a consumer to be advertising under the Lanham Act, particularly where the advertiser competes in a limited market. Allscripts Healthcare v. DR/Decision Res., No. CV 19-11038-NMG, 2020 WL 837444 (D. Mass. Feb. 20, 2020).
Latest Post
More Posts
Proskauer in San Diego at the 41st Annual ANA/BAA Marketing Law Conference
SCOTUS to Decide Whether the Lanham Act Requires Proof of Willfulness for Disgorgement of Profits
Chambers Pharmaceutical Advertising 2019: USA
Suit Over Use of American Heart Association Certification Mark Maintains a Pulse
Second Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Truffle Kerfuffle
District Court Filters Out Preempted “Spring Water” False Advertising Claim
EDNY Sticks a Fork in Angus Steak Sandwich Class Action Complaint
Update: Second Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Lanham Act Claims Based on Allegedly False UL Certification
Lanham Act Injunction Floored Where Social Media Criticisms Were Not “Commercial Advertising”
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS