Skip to content

menu

Open Legal Blog Archive logo
HomeAboutBlogsFAQsSubmit

Latest Post

Single Communication-Based False Advertising Claim Permitted to Proceed

April 16, 2020

A recent decision out of the District of Massachusetts serves as a reminder that a court may consider even a single communication by an advertiser made directly to a consumer to be advertising under the Lanham Act, particularly where the advertiser competes in a limited market. Allscripts Healthcare v. DR/Decision Res., No. CV 19-11038-NMG, 2020 WL 837444 (D. Mass. Feb. 20, 2020).

More Posts

Proskauer in San Diego at the 41st Annual ANA/BAA Marketing Law Conference

October 29, 2019

SCOTUS to Decide Whether the Lanham Act Requires Proof of Willfulness for Disgorgement of Profits

July 1, 2019

Chambers Pharmaceutical Advertising 2019: USA

May 21, 2019

Suit Over Use of American Heart Association Certification Mark Maintains a Pulse

May 20, 2019

Second Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Truffle Kerfuffle

December 6, 2018

District Court Filters Out Preempted “Spring Water” False Advertising Claim

November 6, 2018

EDNY Sticks a Fork in Angus Steak Sandwich Class Action Complaint

October 9, 2018

Update: Second Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Lanham Act Claims Based on Allegedly False UL Certification

June 20, 2018

Lanham Act Injunction Floored Where Social Media Criticisms Were Not “Commercial Advertising”

May 21, 2018

Post navigation

Older Posts 
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
  • New Media and Technology Law Blog
  • Proskauer on Advertising Law
Firm/Org
  • Proskauer Rose LLP

Alexander Kaplan

Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
  • New Media and Technology Law Blog
  • Proskauer on Advertising Law
Firm/Org
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. logo
Seattle, Washington
Copyright © 2026, Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo