Summary: The article critiques the Supreme Court’s 2025 suo motu intervention on stray dogs, analysing it through constitutional principles. It argues that while the Court was justified under Article 21 in addressing public safety failures, its initial operational directions risked overstepping separation of powers and conflicting with existing animal-welfare laws. Although later modifications showed restraint, the […]
The post Stray Dog Matter’s Suo Motu Cognisance & Limits of Judicial Intervention appeared first on Law and Other Things.