15th March 2023
There are many things which were not true about Brexit.
Brexit was never going to be quick and easy: indeed, we were still this year re-negotiating the exit deal.
Brexit was never going to lead to a rush of new free trade deals.
Brexit was never going to make it easier for the United Kingdom to control its borders.And Brexit was not about reclaiming sovereignty: we had sovereignty all along, and that is how we were able to make the Article 50 notification.
But the untruth about Brexit which perhaps is the most irksome from a law and policy perspective is that it was about the Westminster parliament (re)gaining power from Brussels.
For what has happened instead is that Whitehall – that is ministers and civil servants – used Brexit as a pretext for its own power-grab.
There is a version of Brexit – unrealistic, of course – where parliament is given maximum powers over new trade deals and where parliament decides on a case-by-case basis which of the retained European Union laws it keeps or replaces.
A Brexit which was used to empower Westminster and our democracy.
In some ways – and this will annoy some of you – that would not have been a bad Brexit.
But the rhetoric of “taking back control” instead cloaked an increase in discretionary and unaccountable power by the government.
The Westminster parliament seems as powerless as ever against the executive.
Whitehall has become the new Brussels.
And we may have to “take back control” all over again.
***
Comments Policy
This blog enjoys a high standard of comments, many of which are better and more interesting than the posts.
Comments are welcome, but they are pre-moderated and comments will not be published if irksome, or if they risk derailing the discussion.
More on the comments policy is here.