Skip to content

menu

Open Legal Blog Archive logo
HomeAboutBlogsFAQsSubmit

New Protections for Immigrants

By Bass, Berry & Sims on February 13, 2017

The California legislature has added a new provision to the Labor Code expanding protections from “unfair immigration-related practices” (originally passed in 2013) beyond the retaliation context and extending protections to any employee or applicant, regardless of whether they have ever made a complaint.  The law also specifies that it shall be unlawful for any employer to:

  1.  request more or different documents than required under federal law to verify eligibility;
  2.  refuse to honor documents that on their face reasonably appear to be genuine;
  3.  refuse to honor documents or work authorizations based on the specific status or term of status included in the work authorization; or
  4.  attempt to reinvestigate or re-verify an incumbent employee’s authorization to work using an “unfair immigration practice.”

Employees or applicants who feel their rights have been violated may file a complaint with the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE) or may file a claim under state law.  The Labor Commissioner is authorized to award a penalty of up to $10,000, as well as other equitable relief.

Immigration-related abuses have been a legislative priority in California for the past several years.  In 2016, the legislature enacted a new $10,000 penalty for E-Verify violations.  In 2014, the legislature amended the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), making it unlawful to discriminate against a person who holds a driver’s license issued under § 12801.9 of the Vehicle Code and prohibiting employers from requiring an employee to hold or present such a driver’s license, except where possession is required by state or federal law or by the employer under circumstances which are permitted by law.  Indeed, a policy requiring applicants or employees to present or hold a driver’s license may be evidence of a FEHA violation if not uniformly applied and consistent with legitimate business reasons (i.e., is the license needed to perform the essential job functions).

  • Posted in:
    Employment & Labor
  • Blog:
    HR Law Talk
  • Organization:
    Bass, Berry & Sims PLC
  • Article: View Original Source

Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. logo
Seattle, Washington
Copyright © 2026, Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo