Skip to content

menu

Open Legal Blog Archive logo
HomeAboutBlogsFAQsSubmit

Pro Se or not Pro Se, That is the Question

By Anthony A. Hartmann on January 14, 2015

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) recently denied Patent Owner’s counsel’s motion to withdraw from representation of Patent Owner in Shire Dev. LLC v. LCS Group LLC, IPR2014-00739 (Nov. 21, 2014) (Paper 9). Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(e), counsel may not withdraw without PTAB authorization. The Shire Dev. request was denied because the inventor could not proceed pro se as the patent was assigned to LCS Group, LLC, which was also designated as the real party-in-interest.

Read more

  • Posted in:
    Intellectual Property
  • Blog:
    AIA Blog
  • Organization:
    Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. logo
Seattle, Washington
Copyright © 2026, Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo