Skip to content

menu

Open Legal Blog Archive logo
HomeAboutBlogsFAQsSubmit

Has New York City Added a Fourth Element for Determining a Combined Group?

By Eversheds Sutherland SALT on November 14, 2014

A New York Tax Appeals Tribunal Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) recently determined that a federal savings and loan association was not required to include a subsidiary, which was formed as a Connecticut passive investment company, in its combined New York City bank tax return. In the Matter of the Petition of Astoria Financial Corporation & Affiliates, TAT(H) 10-35(BT) (Oct. 29, 2014, released Nov. 7, 2014). While it appears that the New York City Department of Finance audit focused on the three statutory criteria for requiring a combined return, it also raised a fourth criterion—whether the subsidiary or the savings and loan association’s transactions with the subsidiary were a “sham.”

View the full Legal Alert. 

  • Posted in:
    Tax
  • Blog:
    SALT Shaker
  • Organization:
    Eversheds Sutherland LLP
  • Article: View Original Source

Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. logo
Seattle, Washington
Copyright © 2026, Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo