Skip to content

menu

Open Legal Blog Archive logo
HomeAboutBlogsFAQsSubmit

Reinsurance warranty not to sail into storm is enforceable

By Patrick Bracher (ZA) on September 21, 2014

A UK court in Amlin Corporate Member Ltd v Oriental Assurance Corporation held that reinsurers were entitled to enforce an express warranty clause that provided that cargo on the carrying vessel would not be covered if the vessel sailed out of port when there was a typhoon warning.

The vessel did sail into a typhoon despite a warning and the cargo was lost. The court rejected the argument that the warranty had to be read in the light of local coast guard guidelines and in the light of what an experienced insured mariner would have understood the storm warning to mean.

The commercial purpose was to ensure that no unnecessary risks would be taken and not to allow the insured to make a subjective judgment of the degree of danger. In the circumstances the reinsurer did not have to follow the settlement of the underlying insurer and did not have to pay the reinsurance claim.

  • Posted in:
    Financial
  • Blog:
    Financial Institutions Legal Snapshot
  • Organization:
    Norton Rose Fulbright

Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. logo
Seattle, Washington
Copyright © 2026, Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo