Skip to content

menu

Open Legal Blog Archive logo
HomeAboutBlogsFAQsSubmit

Briefing Required Where Complaint Does Not Evidence Jurisdiction in the Northern District of Illinois

By R. David Donoghue on February 12, 2014

Paragon Data Sys. Inc. v. Grand Rounds Software, LLC, NO. 14 C 316, Slip Op. (N.D. Ill. Jan. 21, 2014) (Shadur, Sen. J.).

Judge Shadur sua sponte  ordered the parties to offer their respective positions on whether venue for this patent case was proper in the Northern District of Illinois despite the fact that plaintiff Paragon is an Ohio entity doing business in Ohio and defendant Grand Rounds Software is allegedly a Delaware entity doing business in Pennsylvania.  The only connection the Court could see to the Northern District was the Court’s Local Patent Rules.  Otherwise, no connection to the case was apparent from the complaint.  The Court ordered “early input” from both parties’ counsel as to whether venue was proper.

  • Posted in:
    Intellectual Property
  • Blog:
    Chicago IP Litigation
  • Organization:
    R. David Donoghue
  • Article: View Original Source

Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. logo
Seattle, Washington
Copyright © 2026, Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo