Skip to content

menu

Open Legal Blog Archive logo
HomeAboutBlogsFAQsSubmit

Defense Verdict in Washington County Malicious Prosecution Trial

By Philip Thomas on May 20, 2013
Casino cheats in action. The winning always gives them away.

On April 4, 2013 a Washington County Circuit Court jury rendered a defense verdict in White v. Greenville Riverboat, LLC. 

On May 13, 2009, Plaintiff was playing the card game (21+3) at the Lighthouse Point Casino in Greenville.

Sidebar: What the hell is 21 + 3? Was the rock-paper-scissors table full or something? We’re going to call that mistake number 1 by Plaintiff.

Issues came up that, perhaps, Plaintiff and the dealer were cheating.

Sidebar: I assume it was because Plaintiff was winning, and everyone knows that only the house wins in 21 + 3.

The Mississippi Gaming Commission investigated. Plaintiff and the dealer were taken into a back room and got their hands smashed with a hammer arrested and charged with cheating.

Plaintiff was acquitted and sued the casino for malicious prosecution, abuse of process and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

Sidebar: But did she get to keep the 21 + 3 winnings? If so, did she have to “tip” the dealer half the winnings?

The case was tried April 2-4. The jury returned a defense verdict.

Sidebar: Jurors are biased against table game players, who appear “shady” when compared to the glassed-eyes-looking slot players.

Brett Bollinger of Zaubrecher Treadway in Covington represented the casino. Doug Wade of Greenville represented the plaintiff. Judge Betty Sander presided in the case.

  • Posted in:
    Appellate, Civil Litigation, Insurance
  • Organization:
    Philip W. Thomas Law Firm

Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. logo
Seattle, Washington
Copyright © 2026, Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo