Skip to content

menu

Open Legal Blog Archive logo
HomeAboutBlogsFAQsSubmit

LUSH v LUSH

By Marty Schwimmer on March 21, 2013

Plaintiff has registrations for LUSH for various beauty products. It has a reg granted under Section 44(e) for LUSH for beauty salons. Read the wording regarding ‘beauty salons’ in the complaint. Defendant uses LUSH for beauty salons.

lush v lush
var docstoc_docid=”149472866″;var docstoc_title=”lush v lush”;var docstoc_urltitle=”lush v lush”;

  • Posted in:
    Intellectual Property, Trademark
  • Blog:
    The Trademark Blog
  • Organization:
    Martin Schwimmer
  • Article: View Original Source

Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. logo
Seattle, Washington
Copyright © 2026, Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo