Skip to content

menu

Open Legal Blog Archive logo
HomeAboutBlogsFAQsSubmit

Flameless Candle Terms Construed

By R. David Donoghue on April 2, 2012

Winvic Sales, Inc. v. Valuevision Media, Inc., No. 09 C 7807 Slip Op. (N.D. Ill. Oct. 14, 2011) (Guzman, J.).

Judge Guzman construed the claim terms in this patent case involving flameless candles. Of particular note, the Court held: 

  • The Court adopted defendant’s (“ShopNBC”) constructions of “upper portion” and “lower portion” because plaintiff Winvic waived its arguments by failing to propose claim construction.
  • “The upper portion having a concave surface defining a recess therein” was construed as “the upper portion of the candle-like like body having a surface that is hollowed inward or rounded inward, regardless of whether the inward shape has curved or square edges, and thereby defining a recess therein.”
  • “Substantially in the recess” was construed as “a considerable degree within the limits of the recess.”
  • “Chamber” was construed as “a confined space.”
  • Posted in:
    Intellectual Property
  • Blog:
    Chicago IP Litigation
  • Organization:
    R. David Donoghue
  • Article: View Original Source

Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. logo
Seattle, Washington
Copyright © 2026, Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo