The first day of March brings a whole group of authors discussing the implications of today’s Stab v. Proctor Hospital ruling before the U.S. Supreme Court. Those stories, and the other seven in today’s roundup, were part of a batch of 154 on The LexBlog Network.
- Your Client Has Been Sued in the United States– Now What? – Florida attorney Santiago Cueto of Cueto Law Group on his blog International Business Law Advisor
- US Supreme Court Holds Employers May Be Liable Under “Cat’s Paw” Theory – Los Angeles lawyer Anthony Zaller of Van Vleck Turner & Zaller in the firm’s California Workplace Resource Blog
- Shopping Carts, Kids, and Bacteria – Health Risk or No? – Seattle attorney David Babcock of MarlerClark on the firm’s Food Poison Journal
- Supreme Court Upholds “Cat’s Paw” Theory In Employment Discrimination Cases – Portland lawyer Ryan Gibson on the Stoel Rives World of Employment
- BREAKING: U.S. Supreme Court Allows “Cat’s Paw” Theory of Liability in Discrimination Cases – Hartford attorney Daniel Schwartz of Pullman & Comley in his Connecticut Employment Law Blog
- A Disabled Employee Cannot Be Reasonably Accommodated: What Happens Next? – Los Angeles lawyer Jeffrey Freedman of Liebert Cassidy Whitmore on the firm’s California Public Agency Labor & Employment Blog
- Skycaps’ Collective Action Grounded Before Takeoff – Cleveland attorney Jeffrey Vlasek of Baker Hostetler on the firm’s Employment Class Action Blog
- The Value of Time – Houston lawyer Kendall Gray of Andrews Kurth on his blog, The Appellate Record
- Legal Marketing: Inspiration at the Oscars – Legal marketing expert Paula Black on her In Black and White blog
- The Contingency Fee Agreement Is The Best Deal For Clients – Philadelphia attorney Stuart Carpey of Kreithen Baron & Carpey on his blog, Pennsylvania Injury Law Report