Skip to content

menu

Open Legal Blog Archive logo
HomeAboutBlogsFAQsSubmit

Hiding of Fee Rebates May Cost Citigroup

By Barry Barnett on February 17, 2010

On Monday, the Second Circuit reversed dismissal of a securities fraud case against Smith Barney/Citigroup for misleading mutual fund investors about the true cost of “transfer agent” services, for which the mutual funds paid an outside vendor.  After a few years, the transfer agent, at SmithBarneyCitigroup’s request, started rebating most of the fees to SmithBarney/Citigroup.  SmithBarney/Citigroup nonetheless charged 100 percent of the fees to the mutual funds. 

The Second Circuit rejected arguments that the information wasn’t “material” and that SmithBarney/Citigroup’s conduct didn’t cause any actual losses.  Operating Local 649 Annuity Trust Fund v. Smith Barney Fund Mgmt. LLC, No. 07-5125 (2d Cir. Feb. 16, 2010).

  • Posted in:
    Civil Litigation, Class Action & Mass Torts, Corporate & Commercial
  • Blog:
    The Contingency
  • Organization:
    Barry Barnett, Esq.
  • Article: View Original Source

Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. logo
Seattle, Washington
Copyright © 2026, Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo