Skip to content

menu

Open Legal Blog Archive logo
HomeAboutBlogsFAQsSubmit

ROY-G-BIV Corporation

By Scott McKeown on December 7, 2009

mcePaste” style=”overflow: hidden; left: -10000px; width: 1px; position: absolute; top: 0px; height: 1px;”>On April 14, 2009, USDJ David Folsom issued an order denying Defendant’s, Fanuc Ltd., et al, motion to stay litigation pending the outcome inter partes and ex partes reexamination of patents-in-suit: 3 inter partes, 1 ex parte. ROY-G-BIV Corp. v. FANUC Ltd. et al., No. 2:07-CV-418 (E.D. Tex., April 14, 2009) “it is this Court’s experience that the reexamination process may actually complicate a case by creating additional prosecution history estoppel and disavowal arguments that must be addressed during claim construction.” Judge Folsom concluded that although discovery was not complete, claim construction briefing was complete, and trial is six months away.  Accordingly, Judge Folsom denied Defendant’s motion.

  • Posted in:
    Intellectual Property
  • Blog:
    Patents Post-Grant
  • Organization:
    Ropes & Gray
  • Article: View Original Source

Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. logo
Seattle, Washington
Copyright © 2026, Open Legal Blog Archive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo