Latest from Intellectual Property Notes - Page 3

In one of the first judgments to interpret the High Court of Australia’s recent decision in Self Care, Hungry Jack’s BIG JACK was found not to infringe McDonald’s BIG MAC trade mark. However, the claim that the Big Jack had “25% more Aussie beef” than the Big Mac was found to be misleading or deceptive, emphasising

In this podcast series, Australian partners Rebekah Gay and Emma Iles explore a variety of topics, issues and areas of intellectual property law.
In episode 21, Emma and Rebekah talk all things Barbie and how Mattel has transformed the BARBIE brand into an empire using trade mark licensing and enforcement.

For more in the series

In May 2023 we reported on the IP infringement decision of the Californian District Court, in relation to the dispute between the creators of the Bored Aped Yacht Club (BAYC) non-fungible token (NFT) collection, Yuga Labs, and the ‘artists’ Ryder Ripps and Jeremy Cahen.  In that decision, the Court found against the defendants and, on

On 17 October 2023, Mr Justice Mellor of the UK High Court handed down the long-awaited judgment (some 14 months after trial) in the patent infringement action commenced by Astellas against Teva and Sandoz, in relation to their proposed generic mirabegron tablets, which is used to treat overactive bladder.
The action between the parties concerned

The UK Science, Innovation and Technology Select Committee (which recently conducted an inquiry into the impact of AI on several sectors) has published The Governance of Artificial Intelligence: Interim Report  (pdf  here).  The report identifies 12 challenges of AI, including that for intellectual property, and recommends legislation during this parliament (ie before the general