This article reviews some of the valuable conclusions drawn by e-discovery pioneer George Socha in his recent article Exterro and Duke/EDRM Judges Survey 2019 Series: Part 1, Failure to Comply with Federal Rules. If you find this summary valuable, make sure to check out the article on ACEDS’ blog!
In February, Exterro and
Latest from Exterro's E-Discovery Breakdown - Page 6
Case Law Alert: Specificity Required When Objecting to Discovery Requests
Don’t waste the court’s time by objecting to discovery requests with boilerplate language. RightChoice Managed Care, Inc. v. Hospital Partners, Inc. (W.D. Mo. Feb. 1, 2019) reaffirms the fact that courts want specific and tailored responses to discovery requests.
Overview
In this fraud lawsuit, the two parties could not come to terms on what would
Exterro Client? Meet with Your Peers at a Regional User Group
Exterro® Inc., the preferred provider of software specifically designed for in-house legal and IT teams at Global 2000 and AmLaw 200 organizations, today announced a series of Regional User Group meetings across the US in the spring of 2019.
The Exterro Regional User Groups will bring together Exterro users and executives for a day of
Exterro Client? Meet with Your Peers at a Regional User Group
Exterro® Inc., the preferred provider of software specifically designed for in-house legal and IT teams at Global 2000 and AmLaw 200 organizations, today announced a series of Regional User Group meetings across the US in the spring of 2019.
The Exterro Regional User Groups will bring together Exterro users and executives for a day of
Friday Funnies: Exterro’s E-Discovery Meme Series (Left Exit Edition)
E-Discovery professionals understand that you don’t have to preserve everything–even when there’s the potential for litigation–you have to be reasonable, proportional, and consistent. If you’ve got defined, defensible policies in place–and you follow them–you’ll stay on the courts’ good side. But sometimes a higher up hears about a problem, and everything takes a rapid detour.
Friday Funnies: Exterro’s E-Discovery Meme Series (Left Exit Edition)
E-Discovery professionals understand that you don’t have to preserve everything–even when there’s the potential for litigation–you have to be reasonable, proportional, and consistent. If you’ve got defined, defensible policies in place–and you follow them–you’ll stay on the courts’ good side. But sometimes a higher up hears about a problem, and everything takes a rapid detour.
Friday Funnies: Exterro’s E-Discovery Meme Series (Left Exit Edition)
E-Discovery professionals understand that you don’t have to preserve everything–even when there’s the potential for litigation–you have to be reasonable, proportional, and consistent. If you’ve got defined, defensible policies in place–and you follow them–you’ll stay on the courts’ good side. But sometimes a higher up hears about a problem, and everything takes a rapid detour.
3 Essentials of a Defensible Legal Hold Process
The preservation process may just be the most important stage of the e-discovery process, as it is the foundation of everything that follows. There can be no collection, review, or production of relevant information if your organization failed to preserve it in the first place.
Case law outlines the broad strokes of what is required
3 Essentials of a Defensible Legal Hold Process
The preservation process may just be the most important stage of the e-discovery process, as it is the foundation of everything that follows. There can be no collection, review, or production of relevant information if your organization failed to preserve it in the first place.
Case law outlines the broad strokes of what is required
Don’t Get Fooled: E-Discovery Production Matters!
We spend a lot of time thinking about best practices for all the stages of the e-discovery process here at Exterro. We’ve created hundreds of educational resources, from webcasts to white papers, blog posts to checklists, that educate and inform e-discovery professionals on legal hold, early case assessment, document review.
Every year, we survey federal