In brief

With the rapid deployment of AI in recent years, most in-house attorneys will appreciate the impact of technological advances on legal risk to their organizations. Although a commercially viable and scalable quantum computer does not currently exist, the legal regime related to this transformative technology is already under development, and the potential risks

The CNIL’s recommendation of 12 March 2026, which was published on 14 April 2026 and applicable from that date, provides detailed guidance on the legal framework applicable to email tracking pixels. 

While the applicability of ePrivacy rules to tracking pixels had already been recognised at European level, notably through the EDPB’s interpretation of Article

This article was originally published by IAPP linked here.

Organizations using scraped data for AI training should prepare for heightened expectations around data minimization, transparency and accountability.

On 7 July, the European Data Protection Board approved “Guidelines on web scraping in the context of generative AI.” Perhaps not surprisingly, the EDPB considers that web

This article was originally published by IAPP linked here.

Vietnam’s approach to artificial intelligence regulations crosses many topics and sectors, with a common theme emerging: human‑centered, state‑supervised and legally accountable.

The country’s policy direction is clearly reflected in its first standalone Law on Artificial Intelligence, which took effect March 2026. At the same

This article was originally published by IAPP linked here.

The U.S. Supreme Court’s Slaughter decision may complicate the future of the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, making preparedness and business continuity planning increasingly important.

In Thursday’s World Cup match between Portugal and Croatia, Croatia held a 1-0 lead until the 68th minute. Then, things changed.

New EU AI guidance sets practical expectations for labelling, deepfakes and AI-generated content transparency.

In Brief

Companies are increasingly using AI to create or modify content across marketing, communications and customer-facing channels. As EU transparency obligations under the AI Act move closer to application, this raises practical and operational questions around when AI-generated or AI-manipulated

In brief

On 17 June 2026, the Brazilian Supreme Court (STF) concluded, its ruling on the motions for clarification filed in the cases that gave rise to Themes 987 and 533, concerning the civil liability of internet application providers for third-party content. The amendments refine sensitive aspects of the liability model and clarify relevant elements