Daniel Shaviro

Latest from Daniel Shaviro - Page 4

Yesterday, at the colloquium’s second public session of the semester, Rebecca Kysar (who is visiting at NYU) presented the above-titled paper. It reflects, not just her longstanding international tax policy interests, but also her recent stint at the U.S. Treasury Department, where she was deeply involved in the international negotiations over Pillar 2 (the global

 In an article in today’s Tax Notes (here, but it’s behind a paywall), DC tax lawyers Donald Susswein, Kyle Brown, and J. Anthony Coughlan report their “surprising finding that there are billions in deferred corporate and individual capital gains taxes missing from the official tax expenditure budgets.”What they have in mind is realized

I have posted two new papers on SSRN, comprising my new writing so far this year.One is entitled “Time Is, Time Was: Evaluating the Use of the Life Cycle Model as a Fiscal Policy Tool..” It’s available here.The abstract goes something like this:What time periods should we use in tax and other fiscal policy

Earlier today, I decided to post on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) two papers that I have written since the start of the year. Once they’re up, I planned to link them here and make minor efforts to publicize them to potentially interested readers.But one of them has been pulled by SSRN due to

The 2023 NYU Tax Policy Colloquium will have 6 public sessions, each of them on a Tuesday afternoon from 4:25 to 6:25 pm (and to be followed by a small group dinner). Our speakers will be as follows:September 12: Christine Kim, Cardozo Law SchoolSeptember 26: Rebecca Kysar, Fordham Law School (visiting

 Here is what ChatGPT thinks my novel, Getting It, is about. Not a word of this (attribution of authorship aside) is correct:”Getting It” is a book written by Daniel Shaviro, a tax law professor at NYU School of Law. The book explores the current state of U.S. tax policy and suggests reforms that could

I have posted on SSRN a syllabus and the weekly discussion questions for the seminar, “Law, Literature, and Social Science,” that I am now teaching for the second time. Conceptualizing and executing it took a TON of work, and I feel it’s been a successful class both times. Also, I feel that it’s fairly novel,