The NCAA Committee on Infractions (“Committee” or “COI” or “panel”) recently issued its findings and found that the University of Alaska Fairbanks (“Alaska Fairbanks” or “institution”) committed violations of NCAA legislation. Being that Alaska Fairbanks offers sports at both the NCAA Division I and NCAA Division II levels, the case consisted of two negotiated resolutions.Alaska
Barlow Garsek & Simon, LLP Blogs
Latest from Barlow Garsek & Simon, LLP
NCAA Division I Infractions Appeals Committee: Georgia Institute of Technology
The Committee on Infractions (“COI” or “panel“) found violations of NCAA legislation in Georgia Institute of Technology (“Georgia Tech” or “institution” or “appellant”) men’s basketball program. On the basis of the findings, COI determined that this was a Level I-Standard case prescribed penalties accordingly. This case centered on violations of NCAA bylaws governing recruiting inducements,
The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: Clark Atlanta University (Division II)
The NCAA Division II Committee on Infractions (“COI” or “Committee”) is an independent administrative body comprised of individuals from the NCAA Division II membership and the public charged with deciding infractions cases involving member institutions and their staffs. This case involved impermissible benefit violations in the men’s basketball program at Clark Atlanta University (“Clark Atlanta”
NCAA Division I Infractions Appeals Committee: University of Southern California (Former Associate Men’s Basketball Coach)
The Committee on Infractions (“COI” or “panel“) found violations of NCAA legislation in University of Southern California’s (“USC” or “institution”) men’s basketball program. On the basis of the findings, COI determined that this was a Level I-Standard case for the former associate head coach and prescribed penalties accordingly. The former associate head coach (“appellant”) filed
The NCAA Committee on Infractions Has Spoken: Youngstown State University
The NCAA Committee on Infractions (“Committee” or “COI” or “panel”) recently issued its findings and found that YSU University (“YSU” or “institution”) committed violations of NCAA legislation. This case involved academic integrity and recruiting inducement violations in the women’s soccer program at YSU. The former head women’s soccer coach was at the center of these
Decision of the Division I Independent Resolution Panel (Independent Accountability Resolution Process): North Carolina State University
The Independent Resolution Panel (“hearing panel”) recently issued its findings and found that NC State University (“NC State” or “NCSU” or “institution”) committed violations of NCAA legislation. This case primarily arose out of NCAA recruiting violations committed by the former assistant men’s basketball coach (hereinafter, the “former assistant coach”), the failure of the former head