Summary: This article examines the necessity of furnishing an electronic evidence certificate for proving the contents of documents in electronic form during arbitration proceedings. While an electronic evidence certificate has been held as a mandatory requirement in court proceedings, some courts have relaxed the said requirement for arbitrations. However, in certain cases, it has been observed that arbitrators have considered the absence of such an electronic evidence certificate as a factor for holding certain documents as inadmissible. Subsequently, given the restricted scope of judicial review concerning arbitral awards, such observations are typically insulated from challenge, thereby raising risks during litigation.
Latest Post
More Posts
Two States: Stamp Duty On Merger Orders Passed By Two Different Tribunals
Transforming India’s Merger Landscape: How MCA’s Fast-Track Expansion Will Reshape Corporate Restructuring
Court’s power to partially set aside arbitral awards: An Indian perspective
Flipping the Script on Reverse Mergers: Analysis of The Latest Amendment to Merger Rules
Application for Payment of Stamp Duty must be Adjudicated within 30 Days: Delhi High Court
Admission of application Section 7(5)(a) not mandatory even when default established: Supreme Court clarifies
Interpreting Limitation Provisions – Supreme Court Rejects the ‘Date of Knowledge’ Argument
Enforcement of a Foreign Arbitral Award: Calcutta High Court Contextualises Fundamental Policy of Indian Law
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS