In IPR2015-01537, Momenta petitioned for IPR of claims 1-15 of U.S. Patent No. 8,476,239 owned by Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) on grounds of obviousness over three references: Cohen, Shire, and Carpenter. Petitioner also relied on expert testimony. The claims recite formulations containing CTLA4Ig, which is a stabilized form of a negative regulator (checkpoint inhibitor) of the immune system useful in treating autoimmune disease and rheumatoid arthritis, for example. The Patent Owner opposed institution by attacking the Petitioner’s position as failing to provide a reason to combine the cited references and as relying on impermissible hindsight in arriving at a formulation that satisfied all features recited in the claims (i.e., tonicity, pH, excipient concentration, excipient:therapeutic mass ratio, volume, and stability).
More Posts
PTAB Grants Motion to Amend Claims
Avoid Stumbling Before You Get To The Merits Of A PTAB Appeal
Put Away The Blunderbuss – Attention to Detail and Thoroughness Are Needed in Preparing an IPR Petition
Gamble At Your Own Risk – The Danger Of Petition Overkill
Grinning Patentees Get A Mulligan
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
Firm/Org