In Protect Tustin Ranch v. City of Tustin (2021) 70 Cal.App.5th 951, the Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s determination that the Class 32 infill categorical exemption was properly applied to a project which would redevelop a portion of a shopping center in the City of Tustin (City) and rejected the
Latest Post
More Posts
Fifth District Court of Appeal Finds Petitioner Failed to Exhaust Remedies in CUP Approval Challenge, Despite Ambiguous Administrative Appeal Procedures
Fourth District Court of Appeal Rejects Mahon Interpretation of the Streamlining Act Notice Requirements
First District Court of Appeal Finds University of California’s Decision to Increase Enrollment Is Not Exempt from CEQA Review
SB 50 “Equitable Communities Incentive” Would Exempt Affordable Housing Developments in “Job-Rich” and “Transit-Rich” Areas from Certain Zoning Standards
NINTH CIRCUIT REJECTS CHALLENGES TO UPDATE OF PRESIDIO TRUST MANAGEMENT PLAN
Court Finds CEQA Challenge Not Worth its Weight in Sand
EIR Found Deficient With Regard to Water Supply Impacts and Deferred Butterfly Mitigation
The Sacketts will have their day in Court to Challenge an EPA Compliance Order
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
Firm/Org