In what seems to be an ever-expanding zone of liability for false advertising claims on food products, the Ninth Circuit ruled this week that “external facts” – aka what a competitor does or does not put on their labels – can make the labels of another product misleading by implication.
Latest Post
More Posts
ALERT: Merchants face new wave of class actions alleging excessive shipping charges
Do California 998 settlement offers have legs in class actions?
California Court of Appeal refuses to honor jury trial waiver
Second Circuit guts jury verdict with post-trial decertification
FDA says evaporated cane juice labels are false and misleading
Southern District of California rejects medical sling class bid
Chobani motion to dismiss unceremoniously vacated
UPDATE: Pom Wonderful victory proves Pyhrric
Coca-Cola requires proof of purchase to pay out class settlement for juice false ad suit
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS