Seyfarth Synopsis: In a unanimous decision reversing dismissal of prohibited transaction claims based on fees paid to defined contribution plan recordkeepers, the Supreme Court held that ERISA’s prohibited transaction exemptions are affirmative defenses, and do not present additional pleading elements plaintiffs must satisfy to state viable claims. While acknowledging the decision may allow plaintiffs to
Latest Post
More Posts
The emerging law on women’s advancement programs and transgender rights: a cross-border perspective
Seyfarth Releases Survey Tracking Gender Affirming Care Insurance Coverage Laws
Are Birth Control and Plan B Next? Texas Judge Targets Preventive Care Mandate in the Name of Religious Liberty
Equal Access to Travel Benefits
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Firm/Org