A Massachusetts district court recently ordered defendants in an ERISA fiduciary breach case to produce certain communications with their in-house and outside counsel, rejecting defendants’ argument that the communications occurred in the context of attorneys advising a 401(k) plan’s sponsor and fiduciaries as to their potential fiduciary liability. In re GE ERISA Litig., 2022 U.S.
Latest Post
More Posts
Second Circuit Revives Share-Class Claim in NYU Retirement Plan Class Action
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
Firm/Org