In Citizens for a Better Eureka v. City of Eureka (2025) __ Cal. App. 5th __, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed a judgment dismissing a CEQA action that challenged an approval for the redevelopment of a City of Eureka (City) parking lot into affordable housing (Project). The Court affirmed the dismissal because Petitioner
Latest Post
More Posts
Are Your CEQA Thresholds Supported by Substantial Evidence? Fourth District Rules San Diego County’s Thresholds of Significance Used in Transportation Plan Lack Supporting Substantial Evidence
Sixth District Holds CEQA 30-Day Statute of Limitations Triggered by Local Agency’s Definition of “Final” Approval
CEQA Causes of Action Based on the Subdivision Map Act May be Subject to the Subdivision Map Act’s Statute of Limitations
EIR Certification and Categorical Exemption Upheld for Components of Los Angeles Westside Mobility Plan
First District Holds that Analysis of Development’s Increased Wildfire Risk is a Necessary Component of Project EIR
Alleged CEQA Abuse not Actionable under RICO Says Ninth Circuit
Court of Appeal Finds Substantial Evidence Supports City’s Use of Statutory Exemption to Approve a Zoning Overlay District For Commercial Cannabis Uses
Standard of Review Surprise: Fair Argument Applies Despite Prior Program EIR According to Fourth District
Statue’s Status is History: City Prevails in CEQA Challenge to Removal of Junipero Serra Statue
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
Firm/Org