The taxpayer, a designer, marketer, and wholesaler of apparel and other fashion accessories, shipped products to its customer’s Ohio distribution center. The taxpayer argued that most of its products were subsequently shipped by its customer outside of Ohio after being received at the Ohio distribution center. And, because of this subsequent shipment, the taxpayer should
Latest Post
More Posts
Far from a bullseye: Utah set to adopt targeted advertising tax
And then there were 4? Alaska closing in on sales tax imposition
Snowbirds beware: New York couple fails to establish new domicile in Florida
Nevada Department of Revenue cannot backtrack from its email agreement
Minnesota Supreme Court prescribes a win: Wholesale drug distributor able to exclude rebates from gross revenues
Inequitable barriers to equitable apportionment
Breaking down results of significant state ballot initiatives
California’s next bad idea: Another digital ad tax proposal
New York Tax Appeals Tribunal hits the brakes on taxpayer’s sales tax refund argument
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
Firm/Org