This case examines the application of trademark functionality doctrine in the medical device industry, specifically addressing whether the pink color of ceramic hip components can be protected as a trademark. The case provides important guidance on how courts evaluate functionality claims and the intersection between patent and trademark protection for product features.
Latest Post
More Posts
Federal Circuit Provides Insight on Induced Infringement Claims in Amarin Pharma Inc. v. Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.
Federal Circuit Finds Personal Jurisdiction in an Amazon Product Dispute
Federal Circuit Rules on when the Patent Trial and Appeal Board is Engaging in Erroneous Claim Construction
PTAB’s Decision of a Singular-Only Construction of the Term “The Sample Stream” Reversed
In Re: Cellect, LLC No. 2022-1293 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 28, 2023)
CMS Announces Changes to ACO REACH Model
Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc, No. 2022-1147 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 19, 2023)
Parus Holdings, Inc. v. Google LLC, No. 2022-1269, 2022-1270 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 12, 2023)
CMS Releases CY2024 Final Rule for PACE Organizations
Connect: http://www.sheppardmullin.com/
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
- Antitrust Law Blog
- Cannabis Law Blog
- Cannabis Law Blog
- Class Action Defense Strategy Blog
- Corporate & Securities Law Blog
- Covering Your Ads® Blog
- Entertainment Law Blog
- Eye On Privacy
- FDA Law Update
- Government Contracts & Investigations Blog
- Healthcare Law Blog
- Hospice Law Blog
- Insurance Law Blog
- Intellectual Property Law Blog
- Labor & Employment Law Blog
- Law of the Ledger
- Real Estate, Land Use & Environmental Law Blog
- Trade Secrets Law Blog