Buttonwood Tree Value Partners, L.P. v. R.L. Polk & Co. Inc., C.A. No. 9250-VCG (Del. Ch. Dec. 29, 2023)
To state a claim for unjust enrichment, a plaintiff must adequately plead: (1) an enrichment; (2) an impoverishment; (3) a relation between the enrichment and impoverishment; and (4) the absence of a justification. In this Court
More Posts
Chancery Finds Defendants Were Bound by Voting Agreement to Follow Board’s Recommendation
Chancery Upholds Written Consent Based on Signer’s Sophistication and Opportunity to Inspect
Chancery Denies Specific Performance in De-SPAC Transaction Based on Difficulty of Enforcement and Plaintiff’s Inequitable Conduct
Chancery Finds Defendant Officer Usurped Corporate Opportunity for His Own Competing Venture
Chancery Finds Defendants Liable for Fraud Based on the Failure to Disclose Internal Billing Practices
Chancery Finds that Acquiror Aided and Abetted Breaches of Fiduciary Duties by Exploiting Management’s Conflicts of Interest
Superior Court CCLD Declines to Award Costs for Special Master and Mediator, and Awards only Simple Interest on Judgment in Accord with Superior Court Default Rule
Chancery Finds Derivative Plaintiffs Breached Duties in Withholding Arbitration Award of the Company
Superior Court Declines to Dismiss Counterclaims Based on “Interrelated Wrongful Act” Clause in D&O Coverage Dispute Arising Out of Viacom-CBS Merger
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Firm/Org