Although employers cannot routinely rely on “special circumstances” to restrict employee expression in the workplace, a recent federal court decision confirmed that employees’ rights in this area are not unlimited. Specifically, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit recently vacated and remanded a 2024 NLRB decision that found a large hardware retailer violated federal labor law by banning a “Black Lives Matter” (BLM) insignia from a Minnesota store employee’s uniform following George Floyd’s death, relying upon the “special circumstances” exception.
Latest Post
More Posts
Will Section 10(j) Injunction Petitions By the NLRB Melt Away or Just Cool Down Since SCOTUS Served Starbucks a Win This Summer?
Back to the Future: Employers Must Buckle Up for a Return to the NLRB’s New (Old) Standard for Workplace Rules
Child Labor Law Violations On the Rise – What Should Employers Do?
Employers Beware: The NLRB Limits Severance Agreements
Surprise Surprise, the NLRB Continues Expanding Employee Protections
Profanity or Protected Speech?
The NLRB is Actively Using the Strongest Weapon in its Arsenal – Quick Injunctions
The Biden Administration Takes Aim at Increasing Worker Empowerment
The Ramifications of College Athletes Being “Employees”
Subscribe: Subscribe via RSS
Blogs
Firm/Org